Up until this year, when a certain motorsport game came out that replicates the 2016 F1 season, I called our Playstation 4 “the Tomb Raider box” because that’s pretty much all it was good for. I’m not a big console gamer but Tomb Raider has always been a huge love of both mine and Mr C’s, so it was only natural we grabbed the new Rise of the Tomb Raider game as soon as it became available (which was a year later than on the Xbox, thanks peeps).
I remember struggling with the increased realism in the previous game because whilst on the one hand there were incredible views and staggering graphics, there were also some pretty grisly areas on the map and some horrific death scenes to give you nightmares. Thankfully, Rise of the Tomb Raider seems to have dialled some of that down.
We’ve been playing for a good few nights now and have completed about a quarter of the game, so firstly, a big thumbs up for value for money. What Square Enix seem to have done with this outing is (at least so far) reduce the sheer volume of enemies that need to be dispatched and instead focus on running, jumping, scavenging and of course, completing those all important puzzles. That’s more like the Lara adventures we know and love.
That’s not to say there aren’t bad guys to shoot in this game, because there are and some of them are very hard. And there are things that could go the route of the nightmare – that swimming scene out of the ice, or whatever the heck those zombie wolves are. But it feels like (again, so far) that the developers have gone back to the core of Lara, those tombs and puzzle rooms that involve pulling levers and completing jumps in a certain amount of time to get to your destination. It feels like they’ve got a good balance and know what story it is they’re trying to tell without resorting to gore.
Plus, you can tell they’ve gone back to their roots a little with the reintroduction of Croft Manor, with all its little hidey holes and Easter Eggs, it’s a lot of fun.
So yea, the graphics are even more beautiful than ever before, they’ve got a better balance of gameplay, and we’ve been playing for hours and have just cracked 25%. I guess I’ll be productive again in 2017.
I can’t believe it was three long years ago that I first wrote about the magic of the Duolingo language learning app. Three years of free French lessons (with a few hiatuses here and there) and I definitely feel like I know more of the language than I ever have before. What’s also amazing is looking back at my initial post, to see how the app has developed.
It has a fresh and much cleaner look now, the lesson style has changed slightly from a “three strikes and you’re out” approach to a more “keep trying and you’ll get there” system. There are also a lot more languages out there to choose from, I’ve already experimented with a spot of German and Dutch, but always come back to the more familiar French.
What’s great about the app, though, is that they’re always trying to innovate and develop, introducing new concepts and dropping those that don’t work. Recently, they’ve introduced a new Chatbot feature, in which you are tasked with indulging in a text message style conversation in French.
From grabbing a slice of pizza to hailing a taxi, Bots prepare you for real-life conversations — minus the awkwardness and anxiety. The hardest part of learning a new language just became easy.
Duolingo Bots are powered by artificial intelligence and react differently to thousands of possible answers. Feeling stuck? Hit “help me reply” and they’ll come up with suggestions. Best of all — the more you practice, the smarter they get.
At first, I was superbly excited by the idea – having a go at piecing together full conversations is a great idea, even if it is with artificial intelligence rather than a real life French person. Unfortunately, the reality doesn’t quite live up to my expectations, as the conversations are more structured than I’d imagined. You have a variety of options you can say, and as you start typing an auto-correct style feature will help you if you’re stuck. But if you type something that the app isn’t expecting, then you can’t submit it, even if it still fits within the conversation.
It’s still a fun experience though, feeling as though you are participating in a conversation, and it’s always a good feeling when a question is asked and you know exactly what is being said. It’s not quite what I imagined it would be, but it’s still a really good development – and one that is stacked full of potential for future updates.
Here, in this bunch of albums, you can see the direct result of this year’s Apple Music Festival. I’d always planned to listen to Bastille and their new album, but their appearance at the Roundhouse only spurred me on to move it up the list. Christine and the Queens and Passenger also both came from that fortnight of music, as I wouldn’t have known to pick those albums up without it.
Mr C’s choices, meanwhile, offer a distinct range of songs, and I’ve noticed that we’ve started trying to pick different genres to each other. If I’m listening to alternative guitar bands, he picks 1980s solo female superstars. If I’ve gone for European dance music, he picks an evergreen male star with a rich history of songs (and drama)!
||Listened to an older Bastille album just two weeks ago, and it’s interesting to hear the differences. Still a good album, still full of the drums and drama, but with more of an edge to it. Found the radio inserts a bit odd, but enjoyed the album from start to finish.
|Heaven on Earth
||I know the three main singles from this album but I’ve never really indulged in any extra-curricular Belinda tracks, and I thought it was a really solid album. It’s intensely eighties, obviously, but she has a great voice and it’s got some really catchy stuff in there.
|Hard II Love
||I was sort of dreading this one because I’m still conscious of disliking Drake’s album. However, this was a really solid R&B/hip-hop outing, very relaxing and brilliant to drive home to of an early autumn evening.
||I only knew one song going into this album and it was a bit of a surprise, as the songs were all far more dancey than I had anticipated. I loved it though, really great songs, sort of quirky like Gwen Stefani, with some odd but brilliant lyrics.
||Christine and the Queens
||Saw Christine appear on the Elton John Apple Music Festival evening and was instantly obsessed. Watched her on her support act evening too, and then quickly downloaded the album. Amazing, love it all. Quirky, dancey, French, and Tilted gets right inside my head.
||It’s exactly what you expect from late 80s George, the songs sound mostly similar except for a couple of slightly out of place ballads – at one point he goes very Sinatra swing. However, very entertaining, if a bit “I’m so sexy” in places.
|Young as the Morning Old as the Sea
||Brilliant album. After embarrassing myself watching Passenger on AMF10, I figured I should listen to the new album, and I’m glad I did! Distinctive voice, great guitar riffs and lovely tunes – ranging from easy listening, to the more slow and depressing sort, it’s a relaxed album perfect for chilling out to.
||Ah, I really enjoyed this album. These are one of those bands where I think I don’t know any of their songs but I knew at least three of them and they’re all good ones. It’s beautifully eighties, with those keyboards and drum kicks, but at the same time it hasn’t aged horribly, there are some proper classics on there. Also like how the songs lead into each other nicely, proper album work.
The BBC recently published a short video that explained why some people respond better to having music playing when they’re studying and others work better in silence.
This is a topic that has been on my radar for a long time, because Mr C and I differ radically on our approaches to concentration. He can listen to music as he works and learns, whereas I don’t favour silence but certainly prefer a white noise that requires no additional concentration.
We knew there must be some kind of hardwiring in our brains that differs on this subject (as on so many other topics too), but it’s brilliant to hear about the actual science and reasoning behind the different ways to go about learning.
Music’s effect on our attention can be two-fold. So if someone is very bored with a task, not really engaging with it then having something like music in the background that does excite the person, and raises their level of attention to their environment, can help focus them on the task in hand.
One of the classic psychological theories of performance describes the way we behave on an upside down u-shaped curve. The two points at the bottom are the non-optimal places to be, down here is boredom, mind-wandering, low in attention. Over here is stress, over-stimulation and panic.
Just in case you find that hard to picture, I have taken the liberty of producing a top-notch, well-researched and carefully crafted graph to illustrate:
Music is a stimulus that can move us along this u-shaped curve. So if you’re down here, bored low-attention, low energy, music can bring you up the curve towards your optimum. The other side of it, of course, is if you’re already at your optimum, or worse slightly over then too much music in your environment can push you towards feeling stressed, anxiety and panic.
Basically, it comes down to energy. So people who are more introverted have a higher level of internal energy within them, so they don’t seek a lot of stimulation from the environment because they are already close to their optimum for performance. Whereas extroverts, they are seeking external stimulation, they’re seeking things from their environment, because their internal battery is lower. So that is why extroverts have often been found to perform better when music is in the background, as opposed to people who are more introverted.
I’ve been paying a bit more attention to my Apple Watch exercise rings again recently, and although I usually work on a week by week basis, I was perusing the history in the accompanying iPhone app. There, you can see how you’ve done each month and it’s also a good way of comparing days, ie. seeing if you often take Fridays off.
I was surprised, however, going back a couple of months, to see a trend I hadn’t really noticed at the time.
Can anyone see where the Olympics happened?
There must be some kind of irony in the Olympics being incredibly inspiring in terms of sports and goals and achievements, and yet to indulge in the wonder of it all, I basically had to sit on the sofa for two weeks.
I started watching 11.22.63 a long while ago, and have just, finally, after such a long time, gotten to the end of it. I was so looking forward to watching this series, James Franco goes travelling through time in an adaptation of a Stephen King book? It couldn’t really sound more perfect if it tried.
The first episode was massively intriguing, and I forgave its slow pace as it was setting up an absolutely intriguing premise. The moments where he jumped through the time travel window and found life to be exactly the same again and again, I loved all that stuff.
Gradually, however, I started to lose interest in the series. The date of the title is backwards to my UK mind, and as it’s not a date I particularly know, I found it quite difficult to know where I was in the timeline at any given episode. The characters were good, but I couldn’t see any chemistry between Jake and… I don’t even remember her name it was that memorable a relationship. It was nice to see Franco stretching his dramatic wings further, but I was more interested in the headmaster/secretary, or Marina and the fake brother.
As the series wound to its conclusion, things did start to ramp up a little. I liked how out of control it all started to feel. Jake has worked on this project for three years and it could all go wrong right at the last minute – and mostly due to situations outside of his control. I also thought the moral choices at the end were good: head back and just see her one more time, then leave things well alone.
It looked great, and the attention to period detail was incredible, but in the end the series just wasn’t as riveting as I hoped.
I’m not an American citizen, so am interested in their election only so far as what happens over there seems to affect us anyway. I’m not usually one to talk about politics either, because it always seems to be to be a topic that causes arguments and resolves little. Even so, I think it’s worth highlighting a presidential candidate who has set up her own podcast, called With Her, to cover the last few months of the campaign.
The podcast is gloriously low-key, just a host with one of those soft radio voices chatting with Hillary wherever she happens to be that week. Having said that, I’ve listened to four episodes and Ms Clinton has only been available for two of them. Some interesting guests filled in, her daughter, her running mate, and both had stories to tell that were still worth listening to, but you have to wonder that she must have known she would be busy when agreeing to start up a podcast in the first place. How big a commitment to it did she make?
The show is interesting to me, though, because for the most part it has avoided actual political discussions – presumably because Hillary gets to do a lot of that on a daily basis – and instead focuses on the more human side of the campaign trail. Is there any down time, what do you do to relax, how do you stay in touch with friends and family, etc, etc. It opens up a more accessible side of a presidential candidate, who you otherwise would see mostly shouting policies at cheering or booing crowds.
It’s not a groundbreaking show but it’s refreshing to have such personal access to such a high profile political figure. I assume the podcast has a shelf life too, there would be no reason to continue if she doesn’t succeed, and I can’t see a president having time to chat every week. Even so, however you feel about the election and its participants, you have to applaud the boost this gives to the podcasting cause.